00:01Well a couple years ago at the University of Arizona, Jack Dangermond received an honorary doctorate...
00:10...for his transformational work in GIS and landscape planning.
00:16And I'm not a...I'm not a landscape planner.
00:18I'm actually don't know very much about GIS at all and...but during that visit, we were walking...
00:26...there's lots of receptions and, you know, ways of honoring this distinguished person.
00:32We were quite literally walking through the desert on our way to some picnic ground for a...a...a reception in the...in the national park.
00:43And Jack was describing GeoDesign to me.
00:47And, of course, I, as opposed to some of the other notable people here...
00:51...who were in on the ground floor of this who understood what he was talking about, I didn't really.
00:56I said, well, it sounds very...that sounds really interesting and it's something...
00:59...but it stuck with me over the course of the years that have...that have passed.
01:05This past year, the...the graduate program in planning returned to the College of Architecture and Landscape Architecture...
01:15...and it's a long, sordid story about them...they were there and then they left and for some reason they came back...
01:22...and, I don't...you know, we don't...still don't know why they left in the first place, but they...in the down...
01:27...after 9/11, the university thought they should be doing something.
01:29So something was to move these people around and, you know, and you...you...you...sh...we st...I mean, we still don't know.
01:36It was the...you know, some academic forensics on that would be very interesting to know what happened.
01:41Well, this presents an interesting opportunity because on the way back, well, after they...as they left...
01:47...they were exactly the same size as the School of Landscape Architecture.
01:50When they came back, they were less than half the size, both in faculty and in student numbers.
01:58And, in fact, they have...they were down below accreditation standards and so part of the negotiation of our new dean, Jan Cervelli...
02:06...was to bring them back and sort of restaff this planning program.
02:12So it seemed to me that we have an opportunity to do something rather unique to bring them back into a design college.
02:21They were mostly policy planners.
02:22They were...they are policy planners.
02:25And so this gives us a tremendous opportunity.
02:29Well the s...the second thing I'd like to start with is, and in my career, I've spent most of my scholarly time working on the way people learn.
02:40I'm interested in learning theory.
02:41I'm particularly interested in the way professional programs are designed...
02:46...and that led me early on in my career to working with the learning center, and every university has one...
02:52...and we happen to have a very good one at the University of Guelph in Canada where I spent 27 years.
02:59And one of the things that happened was is that as you go along, people say, it's quite a bit like what...what Carl was saying...
03:05...and people say, do...do this.
03:07You know, get a new curriculum.
03:09How many people have se...heard that?
03:10You know, we're going to redesign the curriculum.
03:13Well, where...where's the information on how you actually design it?
03:17Where's the information on what you actually do?
03:19What do you first and what do you do second and how does that work?
03:24And so, I started looking at that and looked at it in the core structures.
03:28I started looking at it holistically, and we turned it into a design problem.
03:34So what I'd like to do in the first half of this, and go through it fairly quickly, and it's going to have to go by pretty fast...
03:41...is I'm going to show ways in which, if GeoDesign is a profession or a discipline, and no, Mike, not necessarily a department...
03:54...or is it different than landscape planning as we know it?
03:59We can...we can really...I'd really like to talk about it.
04:01Because it's going to be one thing...and dealing with the planners one thing I found out is someone said, kind of disparagingly...
04:08...about...about all that and some other colleagues that were planners, oh these...oh that person's a modeler.
04:14And I didn't...I still don't know if that's a compliment or a, you know, if it was an insult.
04:19So I thought, well gee, I think I'm kind of a modeler.
04:21You know, I'm kind of doing some of this.
04:22So let me see...let me...let me show you some things.
04:25Okay. So get right to it.
04:27If GeoDesign is...is a profession or a discipline, [inaudible] early on said in...in an article back in the 1970s said...
04:37...and one of the definitions of a profession is that it should be able to be taught.
04:41And if it should be...if it can be taught, it should be taught then in a coordinated, coherent manner in a curriculum.
04:48So a professional curriculum is really divided...any curriculum, for that matter...is divided into components.
04:52And the curriculum designers will...will...will...will cite this.
04:56This is the formal curriculum which most of us are aware of.
04:59That's the coordinated set of courses or learning experience or modules and that.
05:03And the other part as Bloom talks about is the cocurriculum, or he...he calls it the latent curriculum, the sort of hidden curriculum.
05:11And those are the things that happen outside.
05:14And immediately we run into what is the difference between a residential student experience...
05:21...learning experience or what happens online for...in distance.
05:26And I don't have a...we can talk about that one for a long time.
05:29But the cocurriculum is made up of all of those other experiences.
05:32It could be study abroad, and you can see them listed there.
05:35It goes down to mentorship, alumni interactions...all those things that happen outside of the formal core structure.
05:45Well, I'm going to present to you then two ways of going about this.
05:48There's the fast way and then there's the comprehensive way, or you might call it the slow way.
05:53And the slow way really does present an opportunity for faculty, student, staff, practitioners to get involved.
06:00Because it's a long conversation, and I won't...I won't kid you.
06:04Okay, the first thing that you can do is you can take a series of learning objectives.
06:10And this is just a partial list.
06:12And you can say, here are the years of the curriculum and we can then down here at the bo...on the bottom left...
06:17...you can say, where is it that we're going to introduce, continue, emphasize, etc.
06:23And we can go through all of the learning objectives for...they...for the curriculum, for the student time in place.
06:31You can start to...you can start to say, well, some of them get a little i, and this is where you can kind of get a little discreet...
06:39...some of them get big Is.
06:41That means we're just going to...just introduce it or here we're going to spend a great deal of effort, time, and course resources on that.
06:52Down in the cocurriculum...down here, are things...that again they're outside the...the normal curriculum...
07:00And there are things that happen as you move through the...move through the program.
07:04And I just picked a bunch.
07:06I...this...this list is probably about two and a half times this list.
07:10But it's something that you can get through very quickly.
07:13You can do this in the c...matter of a couple weeks if you get everybody talking about it.
07:21Well what you do then is in phase 2 is you start to list out then by the courses.
07:26The courses where you want these learning objectives to appear in the syllabi.
07:30And so the syllabi then reflect that and you've put them all up on a wall and you look at them and you say...
07:35...does this all agree with that and to what level are we really talking about it?
07:41And that works very, very quickly.
07:42You can get, so if geodesign is a discipline or profession and we could...we could somehow agree what it is if it's, you know...
07:49...and some of the great discussions that we were having yesterday...
07:52...if we can agree, we can start to put it through...through this model.
07:58Well, let's talk a little bit more about it being a little more complicated.
08:03Each profession has its own set of curriculum domains or realms.
08:09And this is something that we did when I was a visiting professor at San Luis Obispo.
08:15They...we spent an awful lot of time just discussing not only what was in the accreditation standards...
08:22...but we went through and we tried to explain and...and devise much more richness to that.
08:28And this the same thing their planning has those, architecture has them...all of the major accredited programs have these...
08:34...have these curriculum domains or...or realms.
08:37Well, a model that you might start to look at is this is Kowitz and Smith's Students' Form of Development.
08:44And when you look at this, you can say, well, that's pretty obvious.
08:47You know, it's...a lot of these things are really...aren't very complicated.
08:50But what it does is allows us to look at one of the things...a couple of the things a student moves...
08:56...moves along through learn...their learning experience.
08:59The first level, the learner has little knowledge.
09:01They're very instructor-dependent.
09:03And they're requiring methods, relationships, the processes, they're memorizing all the plants.
09:10All along when we talk about learning objectives, we should never forget that it's not about not memorizing things.
09:16There are things in every profession that you have to memorize.
09:20We all know what the third level looks like.
09:23This is when the student...we have the student independent.
09:26The student is out there leading in the field, particularly at the graduate level.
09:30We hope that our students are becoming experts.
09:33In fact, in many cases they will know more than we do about that particular area.
09:38What's really hard, and this is where the controversy in instructional development...
09:42...because I spent years as the director of the teaching center.
09:46I got into these long discussions about where do you put your so to speak best instructors?
09:52Do they end up at the early level as...as many people would claim?
09:56Or do they end up as these transitional coaches or...and...mentors in the second level?
10:08Getting students, letting them go, giving them some freedom.
10:11Eh, a little tether but not too much.
10:13Going to hold them back just a little bit.
10:16This is...this is something that we come back to a couple different times.
10:21Well when you start looking at this in...as a diagram, you have years of the curriculum.
10:27This is not the first year necessarily.
10:29It's...it's just in zones.
10:32Here's the...here are the various Kowitz and Smith levels as we go along.
10:37The curriculum rounds as they move through years.
10:41And one of the more important things is that in the model, you start to give the suggested ways in which it's taught.
10:48I just c...because I serve on the chair of a...on the Landscape Architecture Accreditation Board visiting teams...
10:55...I go to a lot of universities, and you see very quickly if you're aware of this...
11:00...that very often we teach the first year of a program the same way we teach the fourth year of the program.
11:06The...the instructor behaviors, the student responses end up being very similar.
11:10Now we'd like to think that doesn't happen, but it really...it really does.
11:14We also look at various ways in which assessment takes place, and this model then forms...
11:20...forms the basis of...of how we...we begin to plot out a strategy.
11:26Well, the way in which that happens is is that there are, and traditionally, you've probably heard this...
11:32...there's knowledge, skills, and values.
11:35Knowledge, skills, and values in landscape architecture I think got a little out of whack.
11:39They ended up with...what was it, knowledge, skills, and attributes, or something like that.
11:44Which doesn't...it makes it very difficult in that body of knowledge study to move it into a curriculum because it gets rather confusing.
11:51Gronlund, based on the work of Bloom and Krathwohl and others, speaks to the cognitive, effective, and psychomotor domains.
12:02There's a wonderful little book.
12:03I give it to all of...anybody that comes near me.
12:06It's in...I think this is the sixth edition.
12:08I think it's in its ninth edition now.
12:10And it really then...I know it sounds like, oh, God.
12:13This sounds like, you know, this doesn't very...
12:14Well, it's not very interesting.
12:17It's not very interesting except for the fact that because you can get into, you know...
12:21...how do you parse down what is a goal and objectives and the mission and that sort of thing.
12:25But, what happens is it has different components of Bloom's taxonomy.
12:38And what we do is we have then at the beginning, we have knowledge which is the lower level...
12:43...which is why the way they don't use knowledge, skills, and values.
12:47And they move upwards through this, in this case downward...
12:53...but it's to the upper levels then of where we would like to see our students in that zone 3.
12:58We'd like to see them over on the synthesis and evaluation stage.
13:04In the effective domain, here they come.
13:09These are the values.
13:10And what's important in the...it wasn't on the last slide for some reason, it dropped it off.
13:13But if you can just sort of look over here.
13:15What's really important is is that as you begin to work on...on the curriculum and look at the way in which the various syllabi are developed...
13:25...you start to use the verbs...whoops.
13:29I see what you mean.
13:30The...and you look at the instructional objectives from beginning at the...at the...at the beginning...
13:35Let's say undervalues, listens attentively, and down here, displays, you know, safety consciousness, maintains good health habits...
13:44Those kinds of values, and you can...we can translate...we've translated those many times into landscape architecture.
13:53The next is psychomotor skills.
13:55Skills are...are...are one that's...it's often misused term because we talk about teamwork skills and team-building skills...
14:01...and they're really not skills.
14:03I mean, team...teamwork is really more of a cognitive and an effective.
14:07It's really more about...it's about values and the valuing of the opinions of others and working with...with...with a degree of respect.
14:14Skills very often it's...it's psychomotor is very often the manipulation of stuff and how well you can actually do those kinds of things.
14:25And there you start off with perception in the lower level and work to the...to origination at the upper levels.
14:31Again, you may want to just look at some of the...some of the verbs over here.
14:39So what does it look like at the end?
14:41Well, you take the domains.
14:45You take the various areas and you start to...you start to...whoops, sorry.
14:54You start to define by learning objective then what it is in that zone in the first zone in the...in the...
15:04...in the dependent learning zone what it is that you're talking about.
15:07Appreciate the role and values and their effect on creative thinking.
15:12Affective learn...sorry...affective level 3.
15:17And if you go back to those charts, and I can't show you them all at the same time.
15:20But you have to do it sort of with three things on the table.
15:24And...and then, by connecting them, by showing the connections between one objective and another...
15:31...you make sure that they end up being in the same, so to speak, course or module or learning opportunity...
15:38...or whatever it is that you're talking about.
15:40And this is what really you...you want to come out of it.
15:43You want to come out of it because of the fact that we have more and more adjunct professors, people coming in teaching.
15:49You want them to say, Okay, what are the expected learning outcomes from this course in the cognitive, effective, and psychomotor?
15:57What are the course connections in other places?
15:59What are the technical needs?
16:01And what's the program description?
16:03And I know I'm going to do this because it's going to be ab... kind of absurd.
16:06But if you want to know what it looks like, I gave a copy to Jack one time.
16:14This is kind of what it looks like at the end.
16:17Alright. This is the way...with this, then looking at it.
16:22There's our little chart up above that we looked at of the three...
16:25...and then we have the connections that are made between the various learning objectives in the various domains...
16:31...and at the end we can say, did we actually do that?
16:34So the assessment technique then is not based on necessarily wholly on the student output.
16:39The assessment technique...the techniques are really based on what it is that you went off to do in the first place.
16:44So it gives us that opportunity.
16:46Now, I'm going to turn the floor over to Karen who's going to talk a little bit about what we...
16:50...some of the things that we've been doing in relationship to GeoDesign.
16:58Can you hear me? Okay.
17:06I'm going to go through a series of...first of all a set of drawings and digital images...
17:13...that I collected from my colleagues across the country, all at public universities.
17:21And you will find that they are following a very similar process of a design process, somewhat different than Carl's.
17:30And they're, you know, jumping in after the big question has been answered.
17:35But I'm simply going to relate those examples to Bloom's ta...taxonomy...
17:41...and I'm going to move through this very quickly because I'm told I have two minutes or three?
17:46So we are already doing quite a bit of this...of Bloom's taxonomy in our GIS classes.
17:54Many people are teaching design class using GIS, and so the lower level of Bloom's taxonomy is mapmaking and site inventory.
18:04And as you move to the upper-level skills, we have advanced input, collecting input on-site, interviewing people...
18:13...generating new maps from interviews, doing photo interpretation and analysis, and that's a very rich field...
18:22...site analysis, several different ways of putting together site analyses, either through suitability or just through graphic composites...
18:31...schematic plans and then stakeholder reviews.
18:35And so this very simple little graph shows mapmaking is at the lower end and stack...stakeholder reviews is the evaluation...
18:46...and I won't go through all of those.
18:49And then, here are some very pretty examples of...from the University of Arizona simple mapping.
18:57Many of these are just downloaded.
19:00Then there are derived maps which means that you have to use the GIS tools so that's an example of Bloom's application.
19:12Analysis...when you...when we put them all together, this corresponds to Bloom's analysis.
19:19Here's a different one where the student has applied some affective values and chosen the child's view of his neighborhood...
19:30...and selected those elements, those features that child...children are interesting...interested in.
19:38And then there's...this is a series of three projects, very straightforward inventory maps, site analysis...
19:47...in this case suitability analysis leading to the diagrams over here, the design diagrams based on these analyses leading to a schematic plan.
20:02Again, this is an example of Bloom's synthesis.
20:08A third one with the 3D view which we can now do digitally very effectively.
20:16Here's an example, in China my colleague Janet Silbernagel worked with some Chinese colleagues...
20:23...right after the Sichuan earthquake to identify conservation areas, a couple of different strategies, and then a combination in strategy number 3.
20:34My colleague Weimin Li at Cal Poly...this is this fall's Station Fire looking at not just the existing conditions and the 3D view but the...
20:48...moving into the analysis of defensible space and looking at different conditions along the urban interface, especially in debris basins.
21:01But more importantly, what I want to talk about is the challenges that we face.
21:05What are the things that we need to do in order to really move us into GeoDesign?
21:12What...what are the things that we're on the cutting edge of that we need to continue to develop?
21:17And among these are hand drawing.
21:20I think we all agree that we want to be able to continue to hand draw.
21:24We need to teach our students how to draw quickly, iteratively, so that they're using the right side of their brain...
21:32...and then bring those images into the 3D environment.
21:36And we're already doing this.
21:39We need to further explore these 3D tools, ArcSketch, Sketchup, and viewsheds.
21:45We need to really embrace BIM and integrated practice.
21:51Our colleagues in the area of engineering and architecture are very heavily involved in BIM.
21:58Many of them are moving to integrated practice.
22:01The whole design fields need to be aware of what integrated practice is.
22:07It's not just the technology.
22:09It's a matter of bringing everybody to the table at the same time and making sure that the scientists are involved, that the contractor's involved.
22:18It's...it's a very different model of construction.
22:22And then we need to develop better terrain tools.
22:26I think everyone who has worked with terrain tools knows that there are limitations and are...
22:33My good friend Chris Ellis is working on wetlands at University of Michigan...
22:38...tells me that he has to keep moving around to different tools, whereas Randy Gimlet, he uses a different tool for terrain modeling.
22:50And so another set of challenges, integrating other technologies, integrated...
22:56...integration of analyses from the sciences into the design process, and greater integration of vetting tools.
23:07So the question that we're all here to answer, I don't think anybody has the answer, is this a unique profession or is it a skill?
23:15And so will we be training people or educating geodesigners to be designers who have all of these geospatial skills...
23:25...or will we have geodesigners who are simply trained as technologists...
23:31...and they'll act as the intermediaries between the designers and the other disciplines?
23:37And that's a conversation that I've heard several times at this conference.
On day two of the 2010 GeoDesign Summit, Ron Stoltz from the University of Arizona and Karen Hanna from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona discuss ideas and methods for conceptualizing and implementing GeoDesign in the university curriculum.
- Recorded: Jan 7th, 2010
- Runtime: 23:45
- Views: 39749
- Published: Oct 25th, 2010
- Night Mode (Off)Automatically dim the web site while the video is playing. A few seconds after you start watching the video and stop moving your mouse, your screen will dim. You can auto save this option if you login.
- HTML5 Video (Off) Play videos using HTML5 Video instead of flash. A modern web browser is required to view videos using HTML5.